Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web

The page of Camilo Guevara Serafini

Index Politicals Curations Contact The reason to will Injection Construction Favorite Links Global Exexutive Power



The reason to Will
 For Camilo Guevara Serafini
Refuting the argument of Descartes on the method of the doubt, with the method of certainty. Here is postulated that certainty, as the method is safer than the doubt, which only serves to ignore the object of study. Jesus said, men of little faith, because dudáis ... Therefore, good faith requires us to have wisdom, whose sole source is God. It is recommended reading the Book of Wisdom in the Bible. The methodical doubt: Descartes raises a point of departure from the skepticism of a methodical doubt. To know the truth, first of all I have to know what knowledge I have my mind valid. To do this, I doubt everything they know so far: my powers of knowledge, of my senses and reason. I have to doubt the senses for two reasons: "I can deceive, since they are limited, something which I know from the experiencia. There is no way to reliably distinguish between the dream and vigilia.Y addition, I have to doubt the reason, as there may be an evil genius, which you can try to trick me making me believe that what I think my reason is what cierto.Pero ... to doubt all my knowledge, to make this possible, before it is necessary for me there. That is, any activity that I undertake psychological condition is there before me: "Cogito, ergo sum", or think, therefore I. We already have that first true, absolutely no doubt. The method of the doubt he has made to Descartes an unquestionable truth. Now, Descartes will seek to apply the method of mathematics to philosophy: from a first evidence, build a system of ideas, arguments, demonstrations and conclusions that are true. Despite having found an absolute certainty ( "I think, I exist"), and from there a criterion of truth, anyway remains the doubt that any other knowledge we generate the hypothesis of the Evil Genius.
The demonstration of the existence of God dispels doubts about the rational knowledge, it has to Him as their guarantor. Their existence is proven as the cause of the external existence in the consciousness of the idea of perfection, which can not come from me that and it is certainly imperfect. And being perfect God can not be deceptive or may have done to confuse us consistently. We can mistake because we are not perfect, but we are not made for the error. This is what it agreed with Descartes, only that the existence of God does not give us only because we have the idea of perfection, we also have evidence of revelation, the life of Jesus and his presence in human life . The methodical certainty: However, the idea of a genius of Descartes malignant, benign wisdom of God gives us good faith. His will is the truth, and does everything so they do not mislead us. The devil prevaleceráPartiendo not have this certainty that the Bible should be the bedside book for every good scientist. We can mistake and that is no reason to distrust skeptical of everything. A stumble is not falling, and repairing the error grows and learns. We start from the existence of everything and the morning after dreaming, to get up, we realize that the dream was not more than that, and that we must work after breakfast. Because there is no doubting that. Dream to play rugby, asleep or awake, but the reality of a tacle at the feet is remarkable, unlike some dreams. Those who fail to know that play rugby and then I will. Otherwise, what assures me that everything is not a dream of a shrimp? "I think there and then." It is the first that the chicken egg because the chicken was created and was given playable form of the egg. We can not think before there is an idea unreadable. The idea that there is earlier than thought, we can indeed exist and have the mind blank, without thinking. What we can not do is think without exist.
There is thinking that because mathematics is more accurate than theology or philosophy. In this case also, Descartes was wrong. Good faith is accuracy and carries a divine order of the doubt that it is not recommended, but it is more fruitful to seek certainty.

  
We have already been created and we were wrong to flout eat the apple. Now we are being tested and we are free. When you do not like the good, you have the alternative of hell, where the doubt is a thing of every day.

  
We have the promise of eternal life. The light guide the reason for doing so. We hesitate to sink in waters over which walked before, as happened to Peter.

  
Many times the question has a negative value that serves to delegitimize the ideas of good. There is a difference between doubt and ignore something. We can have a mystery, something that is not given to our capabilities, something unknown, but that's different to doubt that it is darker, it the black or white. In the middle of this gray and this is not us who used to use the methodical doubt.

  
More bird in hand is worth a hundred flying: The certainty gives us optimism and encouragement to continue and not dwell on things already observed and verified. If there is anything that we do not know, does not mean that we can not continue with what we have and leave the question open. Knowing is no doubt and hesitation is not known. What if David had been doubted at the time of facing Goliath? It's a question of putting a bit of bravery and courage to approach study. That is the good faith, and give proceed known for winning, because the good always triumphs. The natural order is the guide and then the goal.

  
The certainty methodically makes us from the idea of good, and help from the right side. The comment keep awake in order to understand and solve problems, how to work in the opposite direction, to give us more certainty and well, so to be in a virtuous circle.


The valuable ideas and false: The creationism is the most powerful theory of emergence and evolution of science. On the other hand, evolutionism has only a few centuries and is based on false premises, as the ladder of hominids. It is not true that man descended from monkeys, are two different beings. Life is not part of a cell in the water, but the creative act of Yahweh. The miracle of life can not be explained in micro-biology. The existence of the spirit and soul, in humanity, is not comparable with a cell that live in the sea. Eternal life is a human experience prior to the pseudo-scientific explanations of evolutionism. If anyone would include any questions you can ask the help of the Holy Spirit. The technique of carbon-14 dating to the time of the existence of material will be abandoned by science of the future. She was remembered as recalled, the false premise that the land was held by elephants, and it was square. Another misconception is that of the Big Bang, which says that the origin of the universe is an explosion, which did not have proof. Our material is not dust of stars but we were created from mud. Life can not be explained in another way other than God's creation. Which in comparison with the pseudo-scientific idea, this is sustained by thousands of years of human history and divine revelation. They can not convince me that it is more valuable alunas the views of those who say that it is not verifiable existence of God and can not check an explosion: the big banks. The testimony of the Jewish people is stronger than the idea of the spontaneous emergence of life, there is an important difenecia valuation. Then, the gospels give us a direction: The Salvation. It can be compared, for its resemblance to the beliefs of the Mapuche people with pseudo-science. The Indians of Patagonia believe that we are part of the environment, arising from water and rocks, mountains and lakes. When we die we return to become the same. For evolutionary theory, the life of a first living cell in the water and not be so different, in its origin, a reptile of human beings.
Another premise of the pseudo-science is that the uncertainty is a principle of organization and chaos that works with the order. One example that refutes this idea, is cancer. Cancer cells are chaos, and can lead to death. Life needs order and fend off chaos.

  The wonder of life can not be explained, with the spontaneous emergence. Without God we become autonomous beings who have no transcendent purpose. Good and evil are placed in a sieve relativistic, where the values are accommodating. Relax decisions, then that is the same chichi lemonade. They try to sell us a pig in a poke. An example is the case with the legalization of euthanasia. It is intended to eliminate the suffering and life is eliminated. Of which we are not owners, but they belong to the Divine Light. In conclusion
The method of certainty gives us the opportunity to meet with the Divine Plan, which is mysterious and tends to perfection. We know from his testimony, that Jesus will return to the time of the last days. The question should not be more than momentary thing of what we have to leave. You can have a mental gap, but this is not a method, should decide at the end. Cold or hot, warm us being thrown up.

  
Science has a duty to guide us towards improvement of the living, whose goal is transcendent, and by which we can call to order on high. Otherwise, we will lose the right path and the alternative is chaos.

  
Without being exhaustive three facts framework of knowledge of good. First, it's very interesting what happens with the progress of the study of stem cells. In the near future science may develop tissues for transplantation to a living being. This is obviously an improvement of the living.

  
Second, significant progress is the breakthrough that occurred in the social sciences: today is not discussed in political science that democracy is the better political system and its development occurs around the globe. Human development indices are highest in countries which are increasing more and more democracy. Integrative processes at regional and international justice, will soon lead to the formation of a global executive branch, which is the duty of being Signup International Politics: what is necessary for the solution of global problems, such as weapons of destruction massive, people-trafficking, drug trafficking, environmental pollution, hunger and violations of the rights and duties of the human species.

  
Third, the awareness of the DNA used to identify people by their genetic structure.

  
The reason at will is the title of this writing, because at no point reason must be divorced from what we dictate the contrite heart. To guide the reason we have the will and good faith. This gives us certainty and saves us to live in a sea of doubt.